Our websites may use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, you agree to this collection. For more information, please see our University Websites Privacy Notice.
What is this plan? ADVANCE is a strategic roadmap developed by our community in response to the University and College level strategic plans. The plan focuses on empowering an environment where all individuals, regardless of their background, identity, or characteristics, feel valued, respected, and included.
Why create this plan? We aspire to be a community where all members thrive (rather than survive). A community where everyone feels a sense of belonging and being valued, heard and respected, and comfortable to persist towards their personal and professional goals. We saw the strategic plans as guides, and lean in to the action and application as an opportunity towards collective growth embedded with actions and metrics that keep us honest, transparent, and accountable to our goals. As we elevate to a College of Engineering, now is the perfect time to define who we are, what makes us great, and how we want to improve. We are excited and ready to do this necessary and important work for Connecticut’s Flagship Institution.
We choose to organize our plan using a combination of three change models and theories that are research and/or community supported. We are inspired by the National Science Foundation (NSF) INCLUDE Alliance’s alignment with the models listed below.
Policies
Practices
Resource Flows
Relationships and Connections
Power Dynamics
Mental Models
We present our plan in “choose your own adventure” style so that you can engage with the plan and its content in ways that match how you like to learn or process information.
Option 1 – Action-Oriented Thinking
The information is presented with examples framed as actions that could be done towards completing the goal.
These actions listed based on community input. We embrace the flexibility that this list can change or add actions based on growing or changing requests or needs from our community and the world.
Option 2 – Inquiry-Oriented Thinking
The information is presented with guiding questions that encourage creativity in determining how a goal is achieved.
We encourage our community to consider how you as individuals with your own spheres of influence can be a part of or contribute to the plan.
Regardless of which option you choose, the information conveyed is the same.
Policy | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Policy 1.1 – Systemic Barriers in Academic Policies Communicate and align with educators in our state to strive towards positive and productive “passing of the baton” for transitioning students. | 1.1.1 – Understand the admissions rates for high schools in Connecticut into Engineering, and factors affecting student applications and admissions. 1.1.2 – Alignment with Connecticut High School curricula and learning outcomes. 1.1.3 – Review prerequisite and co-requisite course requirements for each COE major using curricular analytics to minimize curricular complexity and identify blocking factors. 1.1.4 – Increase community college and regional college course transfer equivalencies |
Policy 1.2 – Equity-Focused Courses and Inclusive Curriculum Examine the educational framework to anchor curriculum with courses in equity to integrate a broader understanding of historical context in our world | 1.2.1 – Continue to update VII course documentation to align with common curriculum and engineering curricular value systems 1.2.2 – Request and support COE faculty in creating or updating courses to be equity-focused and inclusive 1.2.3 – Value and invite presentations considering or centering equity or inclusion in departmental or college seminars |
Policy 1.3 – Review Current COE Policies Define the relative value of the three primary inputs: student experience, faculty self-assessment, peer observation, and the implementation recommendations | 1.3.1 – Review each school and departments’ policies for equitable and inclusive language and implementation. 1.3.2 – Post policies on COE employee intranet for transparency and benchmarking between units. 1.3.3 – Co-create revisions as needed towards equitable and inclusive policies |
Policy 1.4 – Inclusive Hiring Strategies Review potential candidates not only for their record of excellence, but also the potential to bring diversity in representation, research and practice to our campus. | 1.4.1 – Understand current hiring practices in COE 1.4.2– Support search committees to implement inclusive hiring rubrics and inclusive-minded representatives |
Practice | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Practice 2.1 – Inclusive and Culturally Intelligent Experiential Learning Remove the disconnect between the strong theoretical grounding received in classrooms, and the identities and roles they envision after graduation through hands-on applications and experiences directly connected to career pathways. | 2.1.1 – Support Equity-Focused Experiential Learning Initiatives 2.1.2 – Create a collaboration between internal and external partners towards understanding how each define inclusion, celebrate diversity, and provide culturally-intelligent learning and mentoring experiences. 2.1.3 – Collaborate with faculty advisors in developing and implementing an inclusive mentoring plan for graduate students 2.1.4 – Support growth and learning of industry partners toward inclusive mentoring and training of interns and new employees |
Practice 2.2 – Tracking and Supporting Students’ Goals and Needs Understand each student’s unique circumstances, learning styles, and aspirations, ensuring that they receive tailored support to succeed in their education. | 2.2.1 – Understand current marketing and scope of CT College of Technology Pathway Program 2.2.2 – Create summer programing to support transition from Community College and build community |
Practice 2.3 – Supporting Research and Broadening Participation Commit to enhancing the quality and scope of research initiatives by providing funding, resources, and opportunities for all faculty. | 2.3.1 – Improve training and workshops for faculty about VII and broadening participation 2.3.2 – Formalize faculty consultations for broadening participation and DEI initiatives 2.3.3 – Create database of all sought and awarded broadening participation efforts 2.3.4 – Invite faculty to VII End of Year Showcase to present progress on efforts, and provide community feedback and accountability |
Practice 2.4 – Supporting APIR and teaching-related DEI initiatives Amplify and support faculty efforts towards inclusive teaching, | 2.4.1 – Amplify and support faculty efforts towards inclusive teaching 2.4.2 – Educate and support faculty in supporting neurodiverse students and accommodations 2.4.3 – Create faculty learning communities to support classroom-based research or DEI in the classroom |
Practice 5 – Understanding Retention in Engineering Collect and understand existing quantitative and qualitative data | 2.5.1 – Collect and understand existing quantitative and qualitative data from advisors 2.5.2 – Modify major change form to collect intentions or reasons for change 2.5.3 – Offer REACH-focused meetings prior to approving major change |
Flows | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Flow 1 – Examine COE and Departmental Budgets Equitably support students in the CoE at regional campuses.
| 3.1.1 – Examine budgets across campuses and departments 3.1.2 – Assess current student success resources and infrastructure at each campus |
Flow 2 – Equity-based Scholarships Offer equity-based scholarships for the summer and academic year.
| 3.2.1 – Complete impact report on 2022-2024 equity-based scholarships |
Flow 3 – Internal Funding Mechanisms Create research and scholarly funding and match opportunities for proposals centering underrepresented students in STEM. | 3.3.1 – Create a platform for individuals or groups to schedule a consultation for planning this initiative with VII staff. 3.3.2 – Create a mechanism for individuals to apply, and develop equitable criteria and guidelines. 3.3.3 – Create a fund for presenting work that examines and reflects on inclusive classroom strategies to the national stage |
Flow 4 – Information Access Examine and support data transparency to administration, faculty, staff, or students to better understand progress, benchmarking, and data-driven decision-making. | 3.4.1 – Create a resource page for faculty and staff to access transparent date to understand UConn Engineering’s benchmarks in comparison to others at multiple levels 3.4.2 – Create an engineering dashboard that faculty, staff, and administrators can access with DFW (receiving a grade of D, F, or withdrawing) |
Structure | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Structure 4.1 – Fostering Mentoring, Connection and Community Intentionally create environments and opportunities that nurture meaningful relationships between individuals, whether in professional, educational, or personal settings. | 4.1.1 – VII Mentoring Network for Underrepresented or Marginalized Students 4.1.2 – Support inclusive mentoring networks for new faculty 4.1.3 – Create infrastructure for community building |
Structure 4.2 – Breaking Silos or Barriers to Collaboration Dismantle the obstacles—whether structural, cultural, or psychological—that prevent individuals, teams, or organizations from working together effectively. | 4.2.1 – Create page on COE Intranet to describe and provide access to existing networks, alliances and working groups 4.2.2 – Promote interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary collaborations |
Structure 4.3 – Examine the Undergraduate and Graduate Student Experience Intentionally looking at a wide range of factors that shape a student’s time at college—academic, social, emotional, and developmental. | 4.3.1 – Understand student perceptions of reporting bias, discrimination, or negative experiences in the classroom 4.3.2 – Create collaborative opportunities for faculty and graduate assistants to create a growth plan based on student feedback 4.3.3 – Support faculty growth in inclusive excellence in teaching evaluations or PTR documents |
Structure 4.4 – Examine the Staff Experience Understand the tangible and intangible factors contributing to the ways employees engage with their work, environment, and organizational culture. | 4.4.1 – Understand staff perceptions of reporting bias, discrimination or negative experiences in the workplace 4.4.2 – Support communication plans or mediation requests for staff experiencing negative identity-based workplace issues 4.4.2 – Create exit interview protocol for engineering staff leaving their role |
Structure 4.5 – Support Internal and External Efforts Create an environment policies, practices, and cultural shifts where employees, students, or members feel welcomed, respected, and empowered to thrive. | 4.5.1 – Continue to invite faculty and staff in the CoE VII ADVANCE Committee 4.5.2 – Create quarterly meetings with all departments to nurture community and and celebrate diversity. 4.5.3 – Elevate departmental initiatives that are better suited as college-wide initiatives |
Control | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Control 5.1 – Include the Undergraduate and Graduate Student Voice Ensure that students are not only recipients of education but also active participants in shaping their learning experiences, institutional culture, and broader community. | 5.1.1 – Empower undergraduate and organizations and graduate student organizations to create a leadership/e-board position as a delegate to the Collaborative Action Network (CAN) 5.1.2 – Create application and selection criteria for community at large and departmental representation |
Control 5.2 – Increase Learning Opportunities for Employees Champion a growth mindset, with individual and collective actions to make local and systemic changes through exploration of social identity(s) with regard to race, gender, class, etc. and how those identities may influence beliefs, values, attitudes, and perceptions about teaching. | 5.2.1 – Conduct a strengths inventory and needs assessment of current administrators and faculty 5.2.2 – Create customized Inclusive JET program and content using existing elements and evidence-based practices to meet unmet needs |
Control 5.3 – Align Experiences with Initiatives Consistently assess climate, belonging, and impact of current initiatives and infrastructures for alignment of intent, impact and progress, or theory and practice. | |
Shift | Highlights of Community-Generated Actions |
Shift 1 – Growth and Thriving Mindsets Shift toward designing CoE programs to foster growth and thriving mindsets. | 6.1.1 – Continue to assess, improve and expand the BRIDGE program 6.1.2 – Expanding Engineering for Impact Course 6.1.3 – Continue to expand BRIDGE summer program for incoming first year students to a BRIDGE Sophomore Summer 6.1.4 – Expand training and support systems for student employees on coaching, teaching or tutoring towards growth mindsets 6.1.5 – Assess the impact of embedding growth or thriving in ENGR 1166 and other courses |
Shift 2 – Positive Foundations and Onboarding Design onboarding experiences to help individuals feel supported, informed, and connected to increase engagement, retention, and overall success in their roles or academic journey. | 6.2.1 – Collaborate with departments to include the Inclusive JET in new faculty offer letters 6.2.2 – Create welcome and quarterly sessions for new faculty to support their transition into COE 6.2.3 – Embed transitionary mentoring into Inclusive JET program plan designed to support new faculty |
Shift 3 – Understanding Community Members’ Role and Value Shift toward elevating each individual’s passion and purpose, and aligning with bandwidth and spheres of influence. |
Policy | Guiding Questions |
Policy 1.1 – Systemic Barriers in Academic Policies Communicate and align with educators in our state to strive towards positive and productive “passing of the baton” for transitioning students. | What factors affect applications and admission for high schools in Connecticut into Engineering? How could alignment with Connecticut High School curricula and learning outcomes better support student success at UConn? What is the impact of examining prerequisite and co-requisite course requirements for each COE major using curricular analytics to minimize curricular complexity and identify blocking factors? What policies need to change in order to increase community college and regional college course transfer equivalencies? |
Policy 1.2 – Equity-Focused Courses and Inclusive Curriculum Examine the educational framework to anchor curriculum with courses in equity to integrate a broader understanding of historical context in our world. | How can we support COE faculty in creating or updating courses to be equity-focused and inclusive? What would change if we regularly invited presentations considering or centering equity or inclusion in departmental or college seminars? |
Policy 1.3 – Review Current COE Policies Define the relative value of the three primary inputs: student experience, faculty self-assessment, peer observation, and the implementation recommendations | Do you regularly review policies for equitable and inclusive language and implementation? Do you post policies on COE employee intranet for transparency and benchmarking between units? What support is needed to co-create policy revisions towards equitable and inclusive policies? |
Policy 1.4 – Inclusive Hiring Strategies Review potential candidates not only for their record of excellence, but also the potential to bring diversity in representation, research and practice to our campus. | What are ways to better understand current hiring practices in CoE to support search committees? |
Practice | Guiding Questions |
Practice 2.1 – Inclusive and Culturally Intelligent Experiential Learning Remove the disconnect between the strong theoretical grounding received in classrooms, and the identities and roles they envision after graduation through hands-on applications and experiences directly connected to career pathways. | What does support Equity-Focused Experiential Learning Initiatives look like? How might we create collaborations between internal and external partners to provide culturally-intelligent learning and mentoring experiences? What role do faculty advisors play in developing and implementing an inclusive mentoring plan for graduate students? What tools do we have to support industry partners toward inclusive mentoring and training of interns and new employees? |
Practice 2.2 – Tracking and Supporting Students’ Goals and Needs Understand each student’s unique circumstances, learning styles, and aspirations, ensuring that they receive tailored support to succeed in their education. | What is the current marketing and scope of CT College of Technology Pathway Program? How could summer program opportunities support transition from Community College and build community? |
Practice 2.3 – Supporting Research and Broadening Participation Commit to enhancing the quality and scope of research initiatives by providing funding, resources, and opportunities for all faculty. | What trainings and workshops would be needed? How are faculty designing and describing broadening participation in grant proposals? How are faculty sharing information about their work in broadening participation efforts? |
Practice 2.4 – Supporting APIR and teaching-related equitable or inclusive initiatives Amplify and support faculty efforts towards inclusive teaching, | How would we educate and support faculty in supporting neurodiverse students and accommodations? Could faculty learning communities help support classroom-based research or equitable or inclusive teaching in the classroom? |
Practice 5 – Understanding Retention in Engineering Collect and understand existing quantitative and qualitative data | Who could we partner with to collect and understand student data? What could be gleaned from collecting intentions or reasons for change on the major change form? How can we better support students looking to change their major? |
Flows | Guiding Questions |
Flow 3.1 – Examine COE and Departmental Budgets Equitably support students in the CoE at regional campuses. | How does CoE examine budgets across campuses and departments? How can we assess current student success resources and infrastructure at each campus? |
Flow 3.2 – Equity-based Scholarships Offer equity-based scholarships for the summer and academic year. | How do equity-based scholarships impact student success? |
Flow 3.3 – Internal Funding Mechanisms Create research and scholarly funding and match opportunities for proposals centering underrepresented students in STEM. | What is the best way to develop equitable criteria and guidelines for internal funding opportunities? How can we share equity-focused work on national scale? |
Flow 3.4 – Information Access Examine and support data transparency to administration, faculty, staff, or students to better understand progress, benchmarking, and data-driven decision-making. | What tools should be in place to support faculty and staff to access transparent date to understand UConn Engineering’s benchmarks in comparison to others at multiple levels? |
Structure | Guiding Questions |
Structure 4.1 – Fostering Mentoring, Connection and Community Intentionally create environments and opportunities that nurture meaningful relationships between individuals, whether in professional, educational, or personal settings. | What does effective mentoring for students look like? Does it look the same for faculty? Staff? Why is community building important? How can we connect faculty and staff to existing networks, alliances and working group to promote interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary collaborations |
Structure 4.2 – Breaking Silos or Barriers to Collaboration Dismantle the obstacles—whether structural, cultural, or psychological—that prevent individuals, teams, or organizations from working together effectively. | Do we understand student perceptions of reporting bias, discrimination, or negative experiences in the classroom? How can we foster collaborative opportunities for faculty and graduate assistants to create a growth plan based on student feedback? |
Structure 4.3 – Examine the Undergraduate and Graduate Student Experience Intentionally looking at a wide range of factors that shape a student’s time at college—academic, social, emotional, and developmental. | What does supporting faculty growth in inclusive excellence in teaching evaluations or PTR documents look like? How can we capture staff perceptions of reporting bias, discrimination or negative experiences in the workplace? What communication plans or mediation requests are in place for staff experiencing negative identity-based workplace issues? |
Structure 4.4 – Examine the Staff Experience Understand the tangible and intangible factors contributing to the ways employees engage with their work, environment, and organizational culture. | What does staff well-being look like? |
Structure 4.5 – Support Internal and External Efforts Create an environment policies, practices, and cultural shifts where employees, students, or members feel welcomed, respected, and empowered to thrive. | How can we elevate departmental initiatives that are better suited as college-wide initiatives? |
Control | Guiding Questions |
Control 5.1 – Include the Undergraduate and Graduate Student Voice Ensure that students are not only recipients of education but also active participants in shaping their learning experiences, institutional culture, and broader community. | How can we empower student organizations to include their voices in university decision-making?
|
Control 5.2 – Increase Learning Opportunities for Employees Champion a growth mindset, with individual and collective actions to make local and systemic changes through exploration of social identity(s) with regard to race, gender, class, etc. and how those identities may influence beliefs, values, attitudes, and perceptions about teaching. | What if the CoE did a strengths inventory and needs assessment of current administrators and faculty? |
Control 5.3 – Align Experiences with Initiatives Consistently assess climate, belonging, and impact of current initiatives and infrastructures for alignment of intent, impact and progress, or theory and practice. | How do departments and CoE respond to unmet faculty, staff and student unmet needs? |
Shift | Guiding Questions |
Shift 6.1 – Growth and Thriving Mindsets Shift toward designing CoE programs to foster growth and thriving mindsets. | What programs/supports are in place to foster a growth mindset? How can we expand and strengthen them? How can we leverage training and support systems for student employees on coaching, teaching or tutoring towards growth mindsets? |
Shift 6.2 – Positive Foundations and Onboarding Design onboarding experiences to help individuals feel supported, informed, and connected to increase engagement, retention, and overall success in their roles or academic journey. | What does a growth and thriving mindset look like in the classroom? Does it look the same for every student? What would change if we prioritized a growth mindset in inclusive and equitable practices in teaching and research for new faculty? |
Shift 6.3 – Understanding Community Members’ Role and Value Shift toward elevating each individual’s passion and purpose, and aligning with bandwidth and spheres of influence. | How could faculty mentoring at every career stage impact retention and success? What if faculty and staff felt a sense of agency to bring their strengths, in whatever form, to their role? |
This is designed to be an interactive session that any past or current member of the COE (i.e. undergraduate and graduate students, postdocs, staff, faculty, alumni etc.) can participate in.
The first part will be a guided and scaffolded feedback session where participants can provide input towards various prompts or themes. There will be time for individual thought or idea generation, small group sharing or feedback, larger group sharing or processing, then refining towards tangible items or actions for change.
The second part will be an open discussion where COE members can pose questions or suggestions that may not have been addressed in the scaffolded feedback session.
The third part will be a follow up after the VII Town Hall. VII staff will collaborate with COE Leadership to answer or address every point and query brought up in the town hall. VII Staff will consolidate responses into a report for full transparency.
The VII Town Hall will not be a lecture style or presentation of updates from VII Staff or COE Leaders. It is designed to be a collaborative and productive space to hear positive and constructive feedback that will improve the human experience in COE.
In Person Agenda | Description | Virtual Agenda |
10 minutes | Welcome in, introductions | 10 minutes |
90 minutes | Scaffolded Feedback Section | 65 minutes |
15 minutes | Open Discussion | 10 minutes |
5 minutes | Wrap Up and VII’s Next Steps | 5 minutes |
FALL 2024 DATES
Friday September 27, 2024, 1:30 – 2:30 PM, E2 323
Thursday October 24, 2024, 12:00 – 1:00 PM, Webex
SPRING 2024 DATES
Friday February 9, 2024, 4:00 – 6:00 PM, Science 1 G01 Tuesday February 13, 2024, 7:15 – 8:45 PM, Webex (rescheduled)
Thursday February 22, 2024, 3:00 – 4:30 PM, Webex
Wednesday March 6, 2024, 2:00 – 4:00 PM, GN 020
Tuesday March 19, 2024, 7:15 – 8:45 PM, Webex
Friday March 29, 2024 1:00 – 2:30 PM, Webex
Wednesday April 10, 2024 9:00 – 10:30 AM, Webex